From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 10 05:50:40 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DB716A4B3
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu (GS166.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.205.169])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37BE643F85
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 05:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dpelleg@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16262.43787.941530.439241@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:50:19 -0400
To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
From: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org>
Sender: dpelleg+@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu
Subject: CNET: amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org>
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:50:40 -0000


The following quote is from http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-5089274.html 
(currently linked from the front page):

"Sun Microsystems' Solaris will become the third operating system to take
advantage of Advanced Micro Devices' 64-bit Opteron processor."

With the other two being Linux and Microsoft Windows. Besides mailing the
author and pointing out his error, does it make sense for someone (the
FreeBSD Foundation?) to issue a press release regarding Opteron support?