From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jul 3 22:40: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07EA37C0DF for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA23801; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007040540.WAA23801@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/19635; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: Andy Farkas Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 01:35:45 -0400 On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:32:11PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: > My only suggestion is to put a dashed line above the totals in order to > clearly say they are totals (like I did below). That might be nice, but I object on the grounds that it isn't consistent with du -c. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message