From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 14 13:56:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E826F16A4CE
	for <apache@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:56:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from goofy.cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org
	[80.65.226.72])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 308D943D45
	for <apache@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:56:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org)
Received: (qmail 8044 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Feb 2005 14:56:12 +0100
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:56:12 +0100
From: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20050214135611.GC64236@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org>
References: <20050213201720.GA24036@xor.obsecurity.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050213201720.GA24036@xor.obsecurity.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: apache@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [ports-i386@pointyhat.freebsd.org: apache+mod_perl-1.3.33_1
	failed on i386 4]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Support of apache-related ports  <freebsd-apache.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-apache>,
	<mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-apache>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-apache@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-apache>,
	<mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:56:19 -0000


--XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:17:20PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> FYI; can you please investigate and/or report to the developers?  If
> you are already aware of this problem but do not yet have a fix,
> please mark the port BROKEN in the appropriate case, so that users do
> not unexpectedly encounter it.

Should be fixes by now. Thanks,

clem

--XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCEK37sRhfjwcjuh0RAjRBAJ0UIUY5847IZrchE1pVQBJt0XuEbQCgrHFm
WYoAHxZwP4jo6grJ2HOI72M=
=qq4V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG--