From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 7 14:16: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297D214DB9 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 14:16:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@unixhelp.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.9.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA74004; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 17:13:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 17:13:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Feldman X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: "David O'Brien" Cc: Alex Zepeda , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RE: EGCS optimizations In-Reply-To: <19990406151633.A28346@nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: > > Well what would be the chances of getting the pgcc patches committed? > > I'm quite interested in doing this, BUT only after the dust has settled > on the EGCS import and the Alpha build is fixed. Also the 1.1.2 PGCC > patches aren't available yet. > > jdp and I have another round of bootstraping to fix our current > less-than-optimal exception handling. I want to wait a week or so until > putting the changes into the tree. It's important to note that PGCC is NOWHERE NEAR production quality, last time I tried it, and not proven at all. I express no animosity toward PGCC itself, but unless it's been proven, I'd strongly oppose anything like this. > > -- > -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > Brian Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ green@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \__ \ |) | http://www.freebsd.org _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message