From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 20:01:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA8D106568A for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163468FC19 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5QK1dkr041931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:01:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4863F5A3.6050209@tundraware.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:01:39 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <4863F317.6010701@tundraware.com> <4863F4A7.1070909@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4863F4A7.1070909@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m5QK1dkr041931 X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Making World For amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:01:50 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world >> intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit >> kernel and make world as everywhere else? > > The same as everywhere else. > > Kris So, I take it that this means that all the userspace programs, ports, packages, utilities, etc. do *not* take advantage of the 64-bit extensions. That is, only the kernel gets the benefit of the wider word. Is that correct? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/