From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 17 08:37:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D72316A407 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:37:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E423513C491 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so1783615nfc for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:37:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UMAhC7QlfZlZDsKfSfLa2hrK9dPPtgLasnAllLBEc+2XwS/O7csFtT/9Jgl7rqD8HcznQFzM48hJIaI9NqIxkAODyLZgoMcHR85nlOB0AP+WbSXJCWMJL6w7IFrySEpLlzcHlfnySYMRbh1SvsdbG0TlPyhTte7PnU2JSota1Bw= Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr731730hue.1171699977195; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:12:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.100.9 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:12:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:12:57 +0100 From: "Claus Guttesen" To: "Steven H. Baeighkley" In-Reply-To: <45D640FE.3070805@frii.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45D640FE.3070805@frii.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bizarre performance issues in 6.2 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:37:08 -0000 > We have been having some trouble with an upgrade to 6.2-Release. The > performance just seems out of whack. We concede that there could be a > reporting issue, but the results we are seeing are far too strange for > that to be our first inclination. > > Background: > > We have 2 identical supermicro superserver 6022c. These have dual 2.0 > Xeons with hyperthreading and 2 GB of RAM. A full description of the > system is avaialble here > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/2U/6022/SYS-6022C.cfm Try disabling hyperthreading on the 6.2-server. In some cases you get a moderate performance-increase, in most cases this setting is counter-productive. regards Claus