From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 18 17:19:59 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB4716A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:19:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CC043D41
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:19:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAIHJvJf052422;
	Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:19:57 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: "Daniel Eriksson" <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:18:51 +0100."
	<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAA9RfmA9mmNEKtShqvfgVooQEAAAAA@telia.com>
	
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:19:57 +0100
Message-ID: <52421.1100798397@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DEVFS problems 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:19:59 -0000

In message <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1P
dsKAAAAQAAAA9RfmA9mmNEKtShqvfgVooQEAAAAA@telia.com>, "Daniel Eriksson" writes:
>
>With a system compiled from sources from yesterday (2004.11.17.12.00.00),
>hiding and unhiding devfs devices does not work.
>
>Normally I do something like this to only expose the devices I really want
>in the chroot/jail environment:
>
>mount_devfs devfs /some/path/dev
>devfs -m /some/path/dev rule apply hide
>devfs -m /some/path/dev rule apply path null unhide
>devfs -m /some/path/dev rule apply path zero unhide
>devfs -m /some/path/dev rule apply path random unhide
>
>With recent CURRENT, the devfs rules results in this error message:
>devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RAPPLY: Inappropriate ioctl for device

My bug, just fixed a minute ago.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.