From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 20 21:12:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76D516A400 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.176.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB2713C46C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l2KLCGvt046484 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:12:16 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id l2KLCGBs046483; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:12:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:12:16 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20070320211216.GA46105@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <46003EA9.6060305@gmail.com> <20070320220616.65b853a2@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070320220616.65b853a2@Magellan.Leidinger.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 147.229.176.14 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, "Thomas M. Hermann" Subject: Re: Linuxolator on AMD64 Guidance X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:12:18 -0000 On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting "Thomas M. Hermann" (Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:06:01 -0500): > > > Greetings, > > > > Is the goal of current linuxolator development to update support to > > 2.6.16 to be 64bit on amd64 or just update to 2.6.16 and run 32bit apps > > on amd64 as is done now? I've subscribed to freebsd-emulation & > > The goal is to get 2.6.16 running. There's no active development for > 64bit support on amd64 (at least I'm not aware of one). netbsd supports linux@amd64 emulation and I think I could do the port in a few weeks. if I get decent access to amd64 machine and enough time/money :) but seriously... linux64 emulation is a MUST and I think the port of netbsd code should not be THAT hard.... opinions?