From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jul 9 20:16:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA03025 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 20:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netdev.comsys.com (netdev.comsys.com [192.94.236.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA03014; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 20:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mobile1.europa.com ([204.202.49.58]) by netdev.comsys.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA02147; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 21:14:36 GMT Message-ID: <33C4541E.D33@comsys.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 20:16:46 -0700 From: alex huppenthal Reply-To: alex@comsys.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Palmer CC: David Lowe , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INN on an async-mounted spool? References: <27223.868500751@orion.webspan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Anyone distilled the recent inn, nntp release installation process for FreeBSD 2.2.1 into the simple 12 step process it really should be? :) -Alex Gary Palmer wrote: > > David Lowe wrote in message ID > : > > Has anyone here tried INN on an async-mounted spool in production? > > Yep. news.webspan.net, full feed (several of them), async spool for > over 10 months now. Until a panic yesterday morning at 5am (and it was > sitting at the fsck prompt when I got here, so I don't even know what > happened), it had been up for 145 days. > > > We're not too concerned about data loss on the spool in the event of a > > failure - but we *are* concerned about the async option actually *causing* > > crashes. While we were running async, we had two mysterious crashes > > (which of course led to some data loss & required human intervention for > > fsck'ing). Since we've gone synchronous, we've not had these mystery > > crashes (knock wood) but we've also not been able to keep up as nicely as > > we'd like to. > > > > Has anyone had success with an async-mounted spool in the long term? > > Pros? Cons? > > Hrm. Interesting. I've heard from another friend about stability > problems on his news box, and I bet he's got it async mounted also. I > run a RELENG_2_2 kernel from late last year (around the start of > November) and I mean to update it soonish, but this is giving me pause > for thought. With the current situation with Hell Atlantic not kicking > USENET spammers off (and that spam acocunting for 25% of all traffic I > see), I can't do without async mounts ... > > Gary > -- > Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member > FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info