From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 24 15:36:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5021065672; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DF28FC0A; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk26 with SMTP id 26so3249689gxk.13 for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:36:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TpYUFCJ+B1DscaBt8cAIBs3JZuCk4who/4PygHn+ztk=; b=di1y83P0dRSpF5UlQiJGFkg2+qyOEIyahwhRIIwUauZdoE6qBgdfB4gm8bi1nMyj9x 9bzmLLEtAG7PNtwS0RohtzCggirAuaSq1uzM9bTHNEL535cmMIVtdrobMsTHxaEDB+hB shF7sFQXdv2nu0zmTYB7eNqGhn+VDaxzF4pPM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.189.137 with SMTP id de9mr1181370icb.162.1316877029741; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:10:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.229.4 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:10:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201108102152.p7ALqUl4075207@red.freebsd.org> <201108102200.p7AM0Nu9026320@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:10:29 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: R2XuEkkk7wTfuRYZPgE54ncaQP0 Message-ID: From: Robert Millan To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Kostik Belousov , Josef Karthauser , Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: kern/159663: sockets don't work though nullfs mounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:36:36 -0000 I found a thread from 2007 with further discussion about this problem: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2007-February/002669.html There's a proposed solution which might cause consistency problems. If I find some time, I'll study the code and try to figure out how to do this properly. No promises though :-)