From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 1 05:33:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D461065674; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 05:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhtx10@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19208FC1A; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 05:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so50021pzk.13 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:33:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=pMgtEF+BtzXi26Pn61jEfaAnMNfF86bdY2/97m4vhnM=; b=ET4KOmsryXvkPUOd1TY4zXCkIxSjqT/rWJ1538HQozX1vwr6wEbfDWARTkPJLKTvgr 920wAdk1Sxo0xRqCud3Ov7qgNCaFiqNBm0guOre/KykavzAd7+/lbSBx95b1vnaLNKcL tsjhFS54pv50beyYI9Rz6q73hTHiR1F6dWIEQ= Received: by 10.142.196.14 with SMTP id t14mr1219379wff.336.1309498434126; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:33:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.165.11 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:33:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E06E668.4040603@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?57q15qiq5aSp5LiL?= Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:33:34 +0800 Message-ID: To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Couldn't connect to wireless networking X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:33:55 -0000 Here is it. SSID/MESH ID BSSID CHAN WEB d8:5d:4c:2d:4f:3a 6 RATE S:N INT CAPS 54M -76:-96 100 EPS RSN WPA > You interrupted wpa_supplicant. Then you tried running dhclient on it > without wpa_supplicant running, which won't work. > > The problem unfortunately is that it can't seem to see the access > point. It should show up in "ifconfig wlan0 scan". If it isn't, it > means something is broken. > Please find out which channel the access point is supposed to be on > (if you see one valid scan result, please paste it here!) and then we > can move on from there. >