Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:43:01 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 243519] [NEW PORT] net-p2p/rslsync-beta: has fix for 4G files
Message-ID:  <bug-243519-7788-iDWK0IxXbk@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-243519-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-243519-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243519

--- Comment #2 from Volodymyr Kostyrko <arcade@b1t.name> ---
As of right now I have no newer beta builds available, yet for half a year =
this
ports was the source of "fixed" binary. As upstream sometimes distributes b=
eta
builds intended for testing or debugging it's better to have separate port =
to
not break the version history of the original port.

Right now it's probably better to flag port as outdated or just skip adding=
 it
for now. The only thing I'm concerned of is that adding new port can take h=
alf
a year, while updating existing port is quite fast.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243519-7788-iDWK0IxXbk>