From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct  9 14:11:09 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20ECF106566B;
	Sun,  9 Oct 2011 14:11:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA008FC12;
	Sun,  9 Oct 2011 14:11:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8566C14E6214;
	Sun,  9 Oct 2011 15:52:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu
Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1])
	by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id kqNL2mfp2jvf; Sun,  9 Oct 2011 15:52:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.106] (catv-80-98-232-12.catv.broadband.hu
	[80.98.232.12])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBB6A14E61E8;
	Sun,  9 Oct 2011 15:52:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E91A704.4090001@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:52:04 +0200
From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
	rv:10.0a1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/10.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net>
	<4E8F1BE1.7080003@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E8F1BE1.7080003@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org,
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:11:09 -0000

On 2011.10.07. 17:33, Glen Barber wrote:
> A bigger reason I think this would be a good thing is actually a rather
> obvious one:  those of us (doc folks) tracking -CURRENT can document
> things as they happen.  More specifically, we would not have to wait
> until we are nearing a release to begin updating documentation that is
> relevant to that release.  This way, doc/www HEAD (well, not necessarily
> www for this case...) would be as up-to-date as possible with -CURRENT,
> which I believe will benefit all of us (especially our users) when
> release time is near.
Yes, this is a very strong reason and is very demanded, imho. Besides, 
release notes are doc-related stuff and are in src. This means that doc 
infrastructure code is scattered through repositories.

Gabor