From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 14:11:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD961065679; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653A08FC0C; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B866AE720C; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:11:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from core.nessbank (client-82-26-212-122.pete.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.26.212.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:11:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Bruce Cran To: Ed Schouten Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:11:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) References: <201011091059.oA9Ax9id007463@svn.freebsd.org> <20101109140007.GJ2054@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20101109140007.GJ2054@hoeg.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011091411.06842.bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Bruce Cran Subject: Re: svn commit: r215034 - in head: libexec/tftpd sys/arm/xscale/ixp425 sys/boot/arm/ixp425/boot2 sys/dev/ata sys/dev/drm sys/dev/isp sys/dev/ixgbe sys/dev/msk sys/dev/pccard sys/dev/sound/sbus sys/dev/... X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:11:09 -0000 On Tuesday 09 November 2010 14:00:07 Ed Schouten wrote: > * Bruce Cran , 20101109 11:59: > > - /* fail requests on the queue and any thats "in flight" for this > > device */ + /* fail requests on the queue and any that's "in flight" > > for this device */ > > Shouldn't it be "that are"? Possibly. If there can only ever be one request "in flight" at a time it could also be read as "fail requests on the queue and any request that is "in flight" for this device". I'm not sure which is correct. -- Bruce Cran