From owner-cvs-all Sat May 6 13: 2:44 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6720837B9B7; Sat, 6 May 2000 13:02:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-07.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.7]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA32271; Sat, 6 May 2000 16:02:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id NAA89613; Sat, 6 May 2000 13:02:14 -0700 (PDT) To: Shigeyuki Fukushima Cc: kris@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.emacs.mk bsd.port.mk References: <200005061045.DAA61204@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000506151430344.NOEJ.904.t-mta2.odn.ne.jp@mta2.odn.ne.jp> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 06 May 2000 13:02:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: Shigeyuki Fukushima's message of "Sun, 07 May 2000 00:13:37 +0900" Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * From: Shigeyuki Fukushima * After argument at ports-jp ML, "ports" (or "port") string is redundant. * Because this file is in ${PORTSDIR}/Mk. Yes. I think of bsd.port.* as main infrastructure files that are included from Makefiles. Those that just implement a small part of what bsd.port.mk does now can be split into subfiles and they can be distinguished by not having the "port" in there. * In this sense, I think that ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk should be * renamed to a proper filename. :) What, to ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.mk? That's a little extreme.... ;) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message