From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 19:26:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093B016A41A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33A413C442 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7128E270E3; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:26:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:26:12 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: BVEE+jQ2u8VEpk7axdheUMR3slRhzSqxSDby+UGWvycZ 1188933972 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F5B17806; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:26:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46DDB153.6040909@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:26:11 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070630) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rui Paulo References: <46DCB831.3030207@fnop.net> <46DD59F9.1080107@freebsd.org> <46DDA265.2090500@fnop.net> In-Reply-To: <46DDA265.2090500@fnop.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann Subject: Re: Killing IPTOS_CE and IPTOS_ECT X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:26:13 -0000 Rui Paulo wrote: > Well, I was asking for comments regarding on the usage of these flags. > I was hoping to commit ip.h along with TCP ECN. > > This doesn't really need to be before the branch, I think. Looks fine to me. ECN would be a useful feature to have. AFAIK nothing else uses these flags. Although I do remember it being possible to fingerprint Solaris boxes based on their response to the ECN Echo, this was around 6 years ago. I second Andre's request for a full unified diff if you want it to go in ASAP. regards, BMS