Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:12:44 +0100
From:      Freminlins <freminlins@gmail.com>
To:        "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net>
Cc:        Atom Powers <atom.powers@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Large File System?
Message-ID:  <eeef1a4c0608090412w6c827af2p132b5eaf1d4c3a6e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE244190-ADC6-4789-BDCD-F60F00FC3DD9@shire.net>
References:  <df9ac37c0608071513n7fdfc928r9d1aa3b9e8edfaec@mail.gmail.com> <ygfzmegm97g.fsf@dominion.borderworlds.dk> <df9ac37c0608071636j2f28bc6en66e985d528e8d85f@mail.gmail.com> <eeef1a4c0608080117r22d05716x1e623dd6ee2cf573@mail.gmail.com> <df9ac37c0608080907r10f9f41fhba9f50f5f354a307@mail.gmail.com> <eeef1a4c0608081201w3dc7c040m8743c69a52e78c84@mail.gmail.com> <CE244190-ADC6-4789-BDCD-F60F00FC3DD9@shire.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/08/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <chad@shire.net> wrote:

> Right now, if no fsck is really really important to you for your data
> store, then get an OpenSolaris system and put ZFS on it.  Never fsck
> again as it is ALWAYS (they claim) in a coherent state.  Or wait for
> ZFS to show up on FreeBSD


Indeed. However as most of my platform is running FreeBSD the problem
doesn't go away.

Not just for the above reasons, I am implementing a Solaris server
> with 1.7TB on ZFS and sharing it to a bunch of FreeBSD machines over
> nfs on dedicated gigabit with jumbo frames on separate interfaces
> from the standard default interface.  (My main reason was to not have
> storage tied to an individual worker server)


I would have used Solaris for this a while ago, but there were no drivers
for the RAID card :-( Hence, Linux....

Chad



Frem.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eeef1a4c0608090412w6c827af2p132b5eaf1d4c3a6e>