From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Oct 12  9:21:59 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F20152BC
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com)
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by misha.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA40223;
	Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:21:55 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi)
Message-Id: <199910121621.MAA40223@misha.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Roasting Newbies
In-Reply-To: <380300D8.9C7965BF@newsguy.com> from "Daniel C. Sobral" at "Oct
 12, 1999 06:35:20 pm"
To: stable@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:21:55 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: dcs@newsguy.com
Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Daniel C. Sobral once wrote:

> Brad Knowles wrote:
> > 
> >         IMO, an  attempted post  by any  non-subscribed user  to any
> > freebsd mailing list  other than -questions should get  this kind of
> > an automated response.
> 
> Many  of the  non-subscribed posters  are subscribed  developers using
> alternate accounts. They  would not be happy in  the hypothetical case
> of this being implemented.

IMO, the  list of the subscribers  should be totally different  from the
list of posters.  Some will want to post from  different addresses, some
may only be subscribed read-only -- depending on a list's policy, etc.

	-mi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message