From nobody Sat Apr 22 17:52:39 2023 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Q3fBD2Fm1z464lP for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 17:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q3fBC09Tdz3rDC for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 17:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfence.it header.s=202304 header.b="N+8/kqaT"; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it Received: from [10.1.2.18] (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 33MHqd5M030660 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 19:52:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it; s=202304; t=1682185962; bh=3xhs1QPvx4Wf4p9e691Zxv2a3FQdFeN59ebSXgkgBUc=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=N+8/kqaTiLitAqZmr9+rYyLkiNN8tdm+uMHBYjpQSm6w0BSZP3e62gMHCMcl5DWqB Iuspi9UN5ZpqeoaiptdPVNAYwxyHtkX3+Zwj7YC3GA41pCbp2/g9S/cu3fM3g7Jv4n lXiQsd/Z1cQOZsd1VKudiYwLULNghoH+HVsa0MeU= X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 19:52:39 +0200 List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: ZFS on root with dedupe Content-Language: en-US To: questions@freebsd.org References: <361F0E2D-C885-4491-9D66-CC077CEE1BB4@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <361F0E2D-C885-4491-9D66-CC077CEE1BB4@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.86 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netfence.it:s=202304]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Q3fBC09Tdz3rDC X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 4/22/23 17:46, Paul Mather wrote: > Deduplication is a per-fileset option Oh! I always thought it was a per-pool setting!!! Did it change, perhaps after the switch to OpenZFS? In fact the handbook says: > To activate deduplication, set the dedup property on the target pool: > > # zfs set dedup=on pool Isn't this incoherent? I mean: zfs set ... *dataset* *zpool* set ... pool Should it be corrected? bye av.