Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 21:55:48 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> Cc: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, kdrobnac@mission.mvnc.edu Subject: Re: Intel Merced FreeBSD??? Message-ID: <37CA00C4.95ACE5D7@softweyr.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908282011280.369-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> When I was in the computer architecture classes, I did a lot of
> modeling of various kinds of things that could be done to speed up a
> processor (the least of which is cache memory, but it stands as a good
> "for instance" thing here). One thing that impressed me, when doing
> modelling of multiple different things like speculative execution and
> the IA64's rumored ability to speculatively execute several different
> paths of loop, was the extreme difficulty to adequately model how all
> the different parts work (and mis-work) together. You end up having to
> really inspect many megabytes of output in detail, just to figure out if
> one feature worked right in one particular scenario, and I was only
> doing a relatively basic piece of modelling.
>
> Trying to model the IA64 would have been a Manhattan Project sized task.
But they've had PLENTY of time. HP had the 64-bit architecture defined
and a simulator underway in 1994, when Intel joined the project. The
Merced, which is a specific chip model with the 64-bit architecture and
x86 emulator, was originally supposed to ship in late 1997.
> Honestly, I am wondering about Intel and HP's ability to really produce
> a reliable chip that had as many difficult-to-model features as the IA64
> is supposed to have. I think that's the real reason that it's not
> actually being sampled. Your point on the 860 is very correct, but if
> they *could* have brought the IA64 out today with the features that they
> have been promising (at the speed they promised) it would have made the
> PowerPC and the Alpha look ill
Uh, no, HP has already admitted that when Merced ships it will be slower
than current-generation PA-RISC CPUs. Which means it will also be slower
than Alpha, PowerPC, and UltraSPARC processors you can buy now.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/ wes@softweyr.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37CA00C4.95ACE5D7>