From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 02:28:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2939D16A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:28:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av9-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av9-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1318643D48 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:28:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av9-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B84D637E6E; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.181]) by av9-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A534537E4C for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C0A237E43 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28:04 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 66030 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Jan 2005 02:28:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28:03 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Mervin McDougall Message-ID: <20050125022803.GA65992@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Mervin McDougall , freebsd questions References: <20050125020305.70545.qmail@web30908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050125020305.70545.qmail@web30908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd questions Subject: Re: fragmentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:28:07 -0000 On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0800, Mervin McDougall wrote: > hi > I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a > problem if when my system starts it indicates that > there is some fragmentation of the files but the file > system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is > this a bad thing? Is this unusual? I guess you mean it prints something like the following: /dev/ad4s1a: FILESYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/ad4s1a: clean, 118393 free (633 frags, 14720 blocks, 0.4% fragmentation) That is perfectly normal, and nothing to worry about. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se