From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 7 16:23:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1787C14CE4 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 16:23:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id IAA25599; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 08:21:20 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <370BE5B7.2A1561FC@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 08:09:43 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os References: <19990407193627.A68829@nagual.pp.ru> <370B84A4.3818F8A@newsguy.com> <19990407221941.A91075@nagual.pp.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > > The problem is deeper. When I reemove it, I got this error: > > -2100 bytes available > > it seems that boot2 needs to be reduced, and I don't know why it becomes > that big and what can be reduced. First candidates are static cmd[512] and > kernel[1024]. Please fix so it can be still compiled with gcc. I didn't see any changes to loader/boot[012] lately. EGCS requires -Os, but gcc should be able to compile it within limits, just like in -stable. Are you sure you didn't test with egcs after removing -Os? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "nothing better than the ability to perform cunning linguistics" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message