From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Mar 11 9:19:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1051F37B404 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g2BHJkrT143102; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:19:46 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <92465.1015863764@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <92465.1015863764@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:19:45 -0500 To: Poul-Henning Kamp From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Increasing the size of dev_t and ino_t Cc: Harti Brandt , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 5:22 PM +0100 3/11/02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >As I said: "Just because we can doesn't mean we will >or should". Okay. I had misunderstood what you were saying in the earlier message. As long as it works for the AFS/ARLA case I'll be happy. I get a little uneasy about these things, because I expect that very few freebsd'ers work in an AFS world, and solutions which will be perfectly fine for NFS mounts might have scaling problems when used for AFS. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message