From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Dec 22 18:48:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ubergeeks.com (lorax.ubergeeks.com [209.145.65.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED3937B416 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 18:48:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (adrian@localhost) by mail.ubergeeks.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBN2mDV00605; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 21:48:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from adrian@ubergeeks.com) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 21:48:13 -0500 (EST) From: Adrian Filipi-Martin Reply-To: Adrian Filipi-Martin To: Nuno Teixeira Cc: Harlan Stenn , Subject: Re: openpackage's 'make' problem with 4-STABLE buildworld In-Reply-To: <20011221005631.GA62940@gw.tex.bogus> Message-ID: <20011222214609.A153-100000@lorax.ubergeeks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > - Less Redundancy/reduced effort > - More Secure > - More Features > - More Up-To-date packages > - Makes BSD more unified > > I am still looking this project but I'd like to make a question: > > - Does this project will be accepted and integrated with > *BSD & Darwin main trees? > Hopefully this won't be a problem. We have significant buy-in from developers in all the camps listed. We want this to be a no-brainer decision that is good for all thr groups if done correctly. Adrian -- [ adrian@ubergeeks.com ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message