From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 09:08:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DB516A4CF for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 09:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from otter3.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904D943D39 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 09:08:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by otter3.centtech.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i4RG8YE8059795; Thu, 27 May 2004 11:08:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <40B61280.4010803@centtech.com> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:08:32 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040520) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Conlen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfsd and nfsiod X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:08:48 -0000 Michael Conlen wrote: > I've noticed nfsd.c and nfsiod.c hard code the limit of 20 processes. > There's also a kernel tunable in FreeBSD 5 for maxiod IIRC. Is there a > reason for this or could they be increased? I just finished a discussion on this subject on one of the other lists - yes, you can bump it up. I've set mine at 50. freebsd-questions and freebsd-net had the thread on the 21st I think.. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. ------------------------------------------------------------------