From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Mar 27 03:47:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA12553 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 03:47:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.keyworld.net (root@mail.keyworld.net [194.21.164.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA12547 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 03:47:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psycho@keyworld.net) Received: from chrism (ppp75.keyworld.net [194.21.164.138]) by mail.keyworld.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA04147; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 12:43:05 +0100 Message-Id: <199803271143.MAA04147@mail.keyworld.net> From: "Christopher Martin at Home" To: "Ronald Wiplinger" , "FreeBSD-isp" Cc: Subject: Re: Multi port Ethernet card and Bandwidth Management Techniques Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 12:45:54 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is very important for ISPs and I hope to receive some good feedback from this forum. Emerging technologies have got a Bandwidth Management Software. Costs around 500 USD per interface and each licence is coded to the ethernet address of the interface. Why don't you have a look at the http://www.etinc.com page? It is ET-BWMGR. Have installed it and am currently using it. It also has a burst manager, but we have not really had the timeto experiment and I have some serious doubts about how much thought bandwidth management solution providers are putting into the requirements of ISPs. Amongst the issues that are not addressed are: 1. Why drop packets when the retransmissions may cause greater problems and result in a negative effect on customers using bandwidth right to the limits of their contracts? 2. Usually demand is much greater than the available bandwidth. So there are going to be collisions anyway. 3. Has anyone thought about the need of limiting tcp sessions on permanent connection contracts? BT do it. 4. Has anyone thought about the need of limiting bandwidth per port? There is a lot of talk but experience is that much is in beta to the third! :-) Has anyone used Aponet's ABM-10/100 (http://www.aponet.com) or the Packeteer from Packeteer Inc.? I would greatly appreciate if we could use this as a forum for discussing bandwdith management techniques. It is still a very novel thing, but being ISPs using packet switching tech, we do not really go ATM and QOS etc from Cisco is still quite new. Any suggestions, experiences, things to avoid or look out for? Chris ---------- > From: Ronald Wiplinger > To: FreeBSD-isp > Subject: Multi port Ethernet card > Date: Friday, March 27, 1998 1:57 AM > > Has anybody a multi port Ethernet card in use and can so say for sure it is working with FreeBSD (and for > BSDi ???) > > I want to build a smart hub, where I want to use as much as possible of such ports, and the old quad router > card from Etinc for the 64k connections. > > I also want to limit the bandwidth for each port. Is there a software available? > > bye > > Ronald Wiplinger > Gen. Manager of Wang's Trace Technology Co., Ltd. > (Taiwan: Taipei, Touyuan, Taichong, Kaohsiung) > Tel: +886 2 2609-0652, Handy: +886 932 251430, Fax: +886 2 2600-0132 > Interphone (G.723.1 as e.g., used in Netmeeting): 203.67.189.35 > http://www.trace.net.tw > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message