From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 23 22:46:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B164C37B401 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.pro.sk (proxy.pro.sk [195.80.161.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B1E43F93 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:46:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from prosa@pro.sk) Received: from peter (Peter [192.168.1.53]) by ns.pro.sk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id h6O5koE46553 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:46:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from prosa@pro.sk) Message-ID: <002a01c351a6$e8905560$3501a8c0@pro.sk> From: "Peter Rosa" To: Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:46:20 +0200 Organization: PRO, s.r.o. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: System hack ?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 05:46:56 -0000 Greetings to every FreeBSD fan. Is anybody out there who can help me with this problem ? I have FreeBSD 4.3 acting as a gateway to I-net and mailserver. In = /etc/periodic are standard scripts, which send statistics to roots's = mail every morning. Dated from April 24, 2003, 04:03 AM (standard time, = when these scripts are running) there ara comming lines as follows: Checking for passwordless accounts: [: 0: unexpected operator The bad one is only the second line (unexpected operator), because till = April 19 all worked well. Can you tell me, why it started from April 20, and what goes wrong ? I = think, it is an error of awk or sed, but I checked their access/modified = dates, and they seem to be the same as the rest of system. I think the = hack is probably not the problem (?!?!?!). May be it is some automated = actualisation, but I should know about it, don't I ? Please help if you can. Peter Rosa