From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 26 20:29:32 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F655106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:29:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A981A8FC0C;
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4863FC2A.5040909@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:29:30 +0200
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
References: <4863F317.6010701@tundraware.com> <4863F4A7.1070909@FreeBSD.org>
	<4863F5A3.6050209@tundraware.com>
In-Reply-To: <4863F5A3.6050209@tundraware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Making World For amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:29:32 -0000

Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>> Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
>>> intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
>>> kernel and make world as everywhere else?
>> The same as everywhere else.
>>
>> Kris
> 
> So, I take it that this means that all the userspace programs, ports,
> packages, utilities, etc. do *not* take advantage of the 64-bit
> extensions.  That is, only the kernel gets the benefit of the
> wider word.  Is that correct?
> 

No, everything is 100% native.

Kris