From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Jun  2  1:26:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2CDBC37B422; Sat,  2 Jun 2001 01:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from phk@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f528Qka32684;
	Sat, 2 Jun 2001 01:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk)
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 01:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: <phk@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200106020826.f528Qka32684@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: jaid@home.com, phk@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: misc/19557: Denying more than 10 ports with an 'open' ipfw policy causes numerous 'unfiltered' ports to appear.
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: Denying more than 10 ports with an 'open' ipfw policy causes numerous 'unfiltered' ports to appear.

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: phk
State-Changed-When: Sat Jun 2 01:25:28 PDT 2001
State-Changed-Why: 
I think this is a timing issue for nmap if anything.

Did you have "log" set on the rules where you denied ports?
If so the extra delay may have fooled nmap.

There is certainly no indication of FreeBSD malfunctioning.


http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=19557

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message