From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 21:04:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9188D1065678; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D108FC1D; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:8466:2a9b:b049:852b] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:8466:2a9b:b049:852b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A9F65C59; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:04:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D700268.3010203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:04:40 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15pre) Gecko/20110227 Lanikai/3.1.9pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrei Lavreniyuk References: <201102182123.p1ILNqOX004065@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201102182123.p1ILNqOX004065@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gnu/138983: [binutils] System binutils too old for modern CPUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:04:31 -0000 On 2011-02-18 22:23, arundel@FreeBSD.org wrote: > In r218822 binutils-2.17 got commited to HEAD. Andrei, I think it's fairly safe to say that binutils 2.17 will probably not be MFC'd to -STABLE (never say never :), but it is now committed to HEAD, and it supports quite a lot of newer CPU features, up to SSE 4.2. So shall we close this PR now?