From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Feb 14 3:45:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B869537B4EC for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:45:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA99775; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:45:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Peter Wemm Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal on shared libs version values. References: <200102140444.f1E4iLU70786@mobile.wemm.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 14 Feb 2001 12:45:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: Peter Wemm's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:44:21 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm writes: > As Doug Rabson so elegantly put it: The last thing we need is for people > to waste valuable development time working around version number problems. Right, so why are we getting bogged down in this bikeshed? I want the next libc version to be numbered 5.pink, btw. Somebody please just take the patch (~des/software/stdio-20010213.diff), replace 501 with their favorite numbering scheme, and commit it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message