Date: 14 Feb 2001 12:45:30 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal on shared libs version values. Message-ID: <xzphf1xtrmt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Peter Wemm's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:44:21 -0800" References: <200102140444.f1E4iLU70786@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> writes: > As Doug Rabson so elegantly put it: The last thing we need is for people > to waste valuable development time working around version number problems. Right, so why are we getting bogged down in this bikeshed? I want the next libc version to be numbered 5.pink, btw. Somebody please just take the patch (~des/software/stdio-20010213.diff), replace 501 with their favorite numbering scheme, and commit it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphf1xtrmt.fsf>