From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 04:33:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A0637B401 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 04:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ptcnat.era.pl (ptcnat.era.pl [213.158.197.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE31C43F93 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 04:33:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from zaks@era.pl) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 766E611541; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:33:00 +0200 (CEST) To: Peter Edwards References: <867k6iagj4.fsf@thirst.corponet.era.pl> <3F16337B.3004C77E@mindspring.com> <200307170954.28580.petere@openet-telecom.com> From: szak@era.pl (=?iso-8859-2?q?S=B3awek_=AFak?=) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:33:00 +0200 Message-ID: <861xwps80j.fsf@thirst.corponet.era.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:33:02 -0000 Peter Edwards writes: > Hi, > >> > All the files are 0-sized, dates are set back to the epoch and >> > directories are seen as files. Exporting ufs2 filesystems works as >> > expected. > > I've had problems like this exporting CDs via NFS to solaris. > Sorry the details are murky, but if its the same problem, there's a > work-around. > Check the dmesg output: does it complain about an "RRIP field" from the cd9660 > code? From the source, I think it was > > "RRIP without PX field?" Yep. Same thing here. > The CDs in question were official Sun CDs with Solaris applications (which, of > course, doesn't mean their properly compliant to a standard, just that it's > likely others will run into the same problem) Mine is Forte 7. It's from Sun too. > If this is the issue, then mounting it with NFS v2 actually fixed the problem > for me: I assume the richer operations from v3 were tickling a problem not > noticed with v2. Indeed. Works fine with version two. I don't know why it gets the file stats wrong for CD9660 and ok for ufs2. It should be above the ISO9660 layer when nfsd sees the files. /S