From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Feb  5 18:43:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA06434
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 18:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (hal-ns3-17.netcom.ca [207.181.94.145])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA06427;
          Wed, 5 Feb 1997 18:42:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.4/8.8.2) with SMTP id WAA16796; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 22:42:27 -0400 (AST)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 22:42:27 -0400 (AST)
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: "Sean J. Schluntz" <schluntz@pinpt.com>
cc: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>, spork <spork@super-g.com>,
        current@freebsd.org, dg@root.com, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: A question about the security of your splinter.
In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.855190160.List@journeyman>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970205224130.7224P-100000@thelab.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Sean J. Schluntz wrote:

> > A parallel code track will be online within a few days for those who believe
> > that THIS kind of response is unwarranted under ANY circumstances.
> 
> I hate to see this continue, so feel free to answer this in private.
> 
> How can any of us know that your 'parallel code track' will be any better?  
> Will you personally guarantee that your flavor of FBSD will be safer and that 
> you will personally make sure that any hole in the product is filled?
>
	Can his 'parallel code track' be called FreeBSD?