From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 20:08:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C83AADB78 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes@meixner.or.at) Received: from dd16522.kasserver.com (dd16522.kasserver.com [85.13.137.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C89117A; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes@meixner.or.at) Received: from mx12.chaot.net (249-249-190-90.dyn.estpak.ee [90.190.249.249]) by dd16522.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2A994560F2; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:07:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx12.chaot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]); by mx12.chaot.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 99529729; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:07:56 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <56C6249C.3090208@meixner.dk> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:07:56 +0200 From: Johannes Jost Meixner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= , dchagin@FreeBSD.org CC: "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: CVE-2015-7547 and linux-f10-* ports? References: <86mvqxlvr3.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86mvqxlvr3.fsf@desk.des.no> OpenPGP: id=C18F24928F1D36EA4FA0B2EF496A9D706250D402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:08:01 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/18/16 08:27 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > René Ladan writes: >> in light of CVE-2015-7547 and various other security >> vulnerabilities, is there any desire to keep the linux-f10-* >> ports? > > I don't think we can just svn rm them. IIRC, c6 doesn't work with > a stock FreeBSD 9 kernel. We would have to issue an EN to update > the Linuxulator. I'm not sure how much work is involved. CentOS 6 doesn't depend on the work dchagin@ has been doing, that's slowly making its way into 10.3-RELEASE. In fact, we used to have emulators/linux_base-c6 as far back as Summer 2013 (that was CentOS 6.2, before I took it for a bunch of upgrades). Dimitry, please correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I remember the only thing that was required to run it was to set sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 so from that side on we should be fine. Yes, you won't be able to run Skype on it, but then you need to upgrade to 10.3 anyway (thanks to Microsoft). - -J > > DES > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWxiSaAAoJEElqnXBiUNQCz8oP/Rse+SN0IfR5d5Ds7eI9Gkm5 lEmbm0CRna4pNJ+NXA++shousPixAecllcg3V4W68BzguLZgjw7C6vqSmoMAPvVX HfogK+72GJJD0ZZN6eJ+p8pvNR9OfFFdv2WQ/sWkbRoxzv0o1igmsfG8d3zXoUWO SExWJT/Kj1LGAlJRj1Aa1ZnCwbRFMbLqKoY2ivNdK6LTaaJOjdyc+sph8eqs1l1g C78LZ6pHNilrmEys49CwlDz0O76FokqaTKj2DQ/F2A7o14rsbJRv3J5myOeOlXub 222MxNkzh9OuMjHzOrTJkgiKN6CPBjVFL6IogLHVBBwrHow7aFvIC7fNFK7BPpnK s+pp1sllCB/IWDNnO0wJeoMbmmNeHyNogz3xXIOEQfN321A77tnuJQzH+hx67baY /SPAM/EswRcWuWP1JXZtn4Sc1VHyKSJRrq3nc3S+5EK/ekvY4DjLa5cffWoWMtui HEtfXKgiagAiCts9XRxVlghbaO+9ghM7QWRsbRcQ9vUmHKP+TuPa2dLK6v/Jwwjt p00nRguEYYSkyYPdjXk1QiXc3TJ5tvotJwf38jeMrL5iB+O1gQenC7hq5W4P45Fq ItgCKTKRh9u3xbnA6HOHRe4JCDHneqK8cXlyJAcFTAkLuYZha9RFagoOVdmqtR0k vJpI8qXODbvn8L+ygVHj =kGO3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----