From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 10:09:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 7E039106568B; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:09:17 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20110304100917.GA56262@FreeBSD.org> References: <69590488@h30.sp.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <69590488@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Wen Heping , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, wen heping , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/eog-plugins Makefile ports/graphics/shotwell Makefile ports/graphics/ethumb Makefile ports/multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile ports/multimedia/mlt Makefile ports/net/mediatomb Makefile ports/net/minidlna Makefile ports/sysut X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:09:17 -0000 On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:55:19AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:37:25 +0800 wen heping wrote: > > 2011/3/4 Boris Samorodov : > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 02:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Wen Heping wrote: > > > > > >> Modified files: > > >> graphics/eog-plugins Makefile > > >> graphics/shotwell Makefile > > >> graphics/ethumb Makefile > > >> multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile > > >> multimedia/mlt Makefile > > >> net/mediatomb Makefile > > >> net/minidlna Makefile > > >> sysutils/tracker-client Makefile > > >> www/swiggle Makefile > > >> x11-fm/gnome-commander2 Makefile > > >> x11-fm/nautilus Makefile > > >> x11-fm/thunar Makefile > > >> x11-toolkits/nucleo Makefile > > >> Log: > > >> - Bump PORTREVISION to chase the update of libexif > > > > > > Was it necessary to bump those and other PORTREVISIONS? So > > > far I was sure that PORTREVISION bumps are necessary as soon > > > In porter's handbook: > > Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped: > > .... > > Changes in the packing list or the install-time behavior of the > > package (e.g. change to a script which generates initial data for the > > package, like ssh host keys). > > ..... > > This update changed plist. I don't think so. Update of *graphics/libexif* changed *that port's* plist (added bunch of new translations), but shlib version was not bumped (it's a minor update), so PORTREVISIONs of the *dependent* ports should had been left intact. Your mentor should have told you this. :-) Now you've essentially urged lots of people around the world to rebuild their perfectly fine packages (considering that libexif is fairly common dependency). ./danfe