From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sun Dec 9 20:09:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B312B132D367; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 20:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 084C179288; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 20:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id wB9JXOVM062965; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:33:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id wB9JXOvW062964; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:33:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201812091933.wB9JXOvW062964@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r341759 - in head: contrib/wpa contrib/wpa/hostapd contrib/wpa/hs20/client contrib/wpa/src/ap contrib/wpa/src/common contrib/wpa/src/crypto contrib/wpa/src/drivers contrib/wpa/src/eap_c... In-Reply-To: <201812090701.wB9711aN058754@slippy.cwsent.com> To: Cy Schubert Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:33:24 -0800 (PST) CC: Cy Schubert , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Reply-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 084C179288 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[rgrimes@freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.79)[0.788,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; LONG_SUBJ(1.52)[203]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.73)[0.727,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.963,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: US(-0.09)] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 20:09:40 -0000 > In message <201812090645.wB96jnso066329@repo.freebsd.org>, Cy Schubert > writes: > > Author: cy > > Date: Sun Dec 9 06:45:49 2018 > > New Revision: 341759 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/341759 > > > > Log: > > MFV r341618: > > > > Update wpa 2.6 --> 2.7. > > Relnotes: yes As an FYI, or maybe a new procedure, doing a reply to a commit message adding relnotes: yes does very little to insure that this commit gets refered to in release notes. What about we add RELNOTES.missed to the tree next to UPDATING, and when someone forgets to tag the Relnotes:yes into a commit you just follow up with a commit to that file, stating the svn revision which was missing the note and then we have a nice documented and clean way to extract the missing release note items, rather than trying to cull it from a thread in a mail list archive. The file would get truncated to 0 at appropriate times on various branches. Thoughts? Rod