From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 16 17:56:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F04616A4CE; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:56:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF3643D2D; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5GHuLkP011998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:56:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i5GHuLg6011995; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:56:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:56:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200406161756.i5GHuLg6011995@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20040616174737.GA25398@ip.net.ua> References: <200406150124.i5F1Ofp9084012@repoman.freebsd.org> <200406151522.i5FFMeIc001885@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20040616062409.GC20866@ip.net.ua> <200406161543.i5GFhYq7009877@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20040616174737.GA25398@ip.net.ua> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys read.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:56:52 -0000 < said: > But FreeBSD *is* the implementation, and in this implementation > IOV_MAX is the #define. Does that make sense? No, because we are not making any guarantees that IOV_MAX will be defined as a constant now or in the future, nor do we wish for programmers looking to make their programs portable to be misled about the constancy of IOV_MAX. -GAWollman