Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:18:28 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To:        Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
Cc:        Giovanni Trematerra <gianni@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: deprecated TIOCSPGRP and TIOCGPGRP ioctl command
Message-ID:  <20111110031828.GC6110@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <D2F25708-5E0B-4270-83F0-79286C5A581A@gmail.com>
References:  <CACfq09210zdar=%2BM40gLoVtZnwLda88T1FJBbLXiy9e3t8-9NQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGE5yCor9c%2Bb7hZaF8NLdxc2F8PPfi0kTZFLXY5nvA%2Bbm1Ytuw@mail.gmail.com> <D2F25708-5E0B-4270-83F0-79286C5A581A@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This just reeks of gratuitous breakage.  Sure it's 
marked depricated, but there's little reason to break a ton
of applications just to remove 11 lines of code.

Maybe we can put it under an ifndef IVORY_TOWER.

-Alfred

* Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> [111109 18:22] wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Peter Wemm wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Giovanni Trematerra <gianni@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> Are they deprecated enough to be removed, now?
> >> FYI FIFO doesn't support them.
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Gianni
> >> 
> >> =================================
> >> --- sys/kern/sys_pipe.c (revision 227233)
> >> +++ sys/kern/sys_pipe.c (working copy)
> >> @@ -1304,17 +1304,6 @@ pipe_ioctl(fp, cmd, data, active_cred, td)
> >>        *(int *)data = fgetown(&mpipe->pipe_sigio);
> >>        break;
> >> 
> >> -   /* This is deprecated, FIOSETOWN should be used instead. */
> >> -   case TIOCSPGRP:
> >> -       PIPE_UNLOCK(mpipe);
> >> -       error = fsetown(-(*(int *)data), &mpipe->pipe_sigio);
> >> -       goto out_unlocked;
> >> -
> >> -   /* This is deprecated, FIOGETOWN should be used instead. */
> >> -   case TIOCGPGRP:
> >> -       *(int *)data = -fgetown(&mpipe->pipe_sigio);
> >> -       break;
> >> -
> >>    default:
> >>        error = ENOTTY;
> > 
> > Be very very careful with this.  It's part of the classic BSD job
> > control API.  It would be wise to survey whether any ports shells use
> > this.
> > 
> > You might also want to consider things like this in libc:
> > int
> > tcsetpgrp(int fd, pid_t pgrp)
> > {
> >        int s;
> > 
> >        s = pgrp;
> >        return (_ioctl(fd, TIOCSPGRP, &s));
> > }
> > Our own libc code uses this, albeit on an API intended to be used on a tty.
> > 
> > The shell I'd be most concerned about is csh/tcsh in our tree. It has
> > quite an #ifdef legacy layer and I couldn't convince myself it wasn't
> > using this indirectly (or the tc* functions) on pipes.
> > 
> > It might also be an idea to see if the linux compat layer can be
> > switched over to using the newer API.
> 
> Move to a compat library perhaps?
> -Garrett_______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein
.- VMOA #5191, 03 vmax, 92 gs500, 85 ch250, 07 zx10
.- FreeBSD committer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111110031828.GC6110>