Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:57:45 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: kris@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org, maksim_l@mail.ru Subject: Re: kern/118993: [ipfw] page fault - probably it's a locking problem Message-ID: <4771FB69.6070900@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <200712251415.lBPEFFtQ005961@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200712251415.lBPEFFtQ005961@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
kris@FreeBSD.org wrote:
> State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 25 14:14:45 UTC 2007
> State-Changed-Why:
> Oops, it was actually a recursive panic and the first one is indeed
> ipfw-related. The ipfw ruleset would still help though.
I'm not sure that Maxim (a person who got the problem) can
publish his rules. But as i know there is a typical firewall-script
(`ipfw -f flush` and a lot of other rules).
As i see in the code, panic is in the line 2538:
if (set_disable & (1 << f->set) )
continue;
I think panic here can be only when "f" is invalid. I'm right?
But it seems protected with IPFW_RLOCK...
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4771FB69.6070900>