From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 3 18:45:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBF334B; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [78.110.53.255]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DBA8FC15; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd (unknown [72.5.114.2]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A0C9A8FC2B; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:45:29 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:45:26 -0800 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Chris Rees Subject: Re: svn commit: r243554 - in head/usr.sbin/pkg_install: add create delete info lib updating version Message-Id: <20121203104526.5041f0eefe10045375b77df1@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <201211260511.qAQ5B7DQ002346@svn.freebsd.org> <20121128170032.730be5fab68dba2a09aaa14e@FreeBSD.org> <20121128183422.714562856f27371c95d2a84e@FreeBSD.org> <20121129073846.GG97474@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121130144040.99559ed924a48b909cbd3c4b@FreeBSD.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , src-committers@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov , svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:45:44 -0000 On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 08:52:52 +0000 Chris Rees mentioned: > > UPDATING, yes. Also as I reminded you in IRC last week, users of -CURRENT > are expected to follow -current@. Users of ports are also strongly > recommended to read -ports-announce. Repeating that several times does not make it true. > > What are you trying to achieve here? You discussed this previously, and > got exactly the same answer. There were extensive discussions over it in > ports@. I'm trying to point out, that this commit (and previous pkgng ones) was made without proper peer review and consulations, which is a recommended practice in THIS project. Doing so hurts not only the committer reputation (which I frankly do not care about), but the project image as a whole. I really don't want to go in and revert these changes, but I want to find a reasonable solution. It's not the first time an unreviewed ports-related change is being committed to a tree by that hurts us, who actually use FreeBSD and not consider it a personal playground. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments