From owner-freebsd-arch  Sat Mar 15 22:23:21 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7689437B401; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:23:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A1DA443FA3; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:23:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h2G6NFFU081965;
	Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:23:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h2G6NFaF081964;
	Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:23:15 -0800
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: WARNS=6 changes
Message-ID: <20030316062315.GA75492@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: arch@freebsd.org
Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>,
	Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org
References: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD Group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:20:45PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> I've been told it would be good to post this change here for discussion,
> so here it is.  This patch changes the default standard used for
> warnings from c89 to c99.

Hi Maxime,

I am all for this change of making our C standard level C99.
Do you think we should do this for lower WARNS than 6?  As far as
warnings go, -ansi (aka, -std=c89) is responsable for all the 'long long'
warnings and that is why it was done at WARNS==6.  Since that will go
away, maybe we should turn on -std= at a lower WARNS.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message