From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 12 10:20:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B676C153D1 for ; Wed, 12 May 1999 10:20:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA12173; Wed, 12 May 1999 13:21:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA00961; Wed, 12 May 1999 13:20:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.2/8.6.9) id NAA14627; Wed, 12 May 1999 13:20:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:20:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199905121720.NAA14627@lakes.dignus.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, gbuffing@tiger.fhsu.edu Subject: Re: freeBSD 3.1 and NAG FORTRAN 90 In-Reply-To: <8625676F.005E679C.00@tiger.fhsu.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I just spoke to a representative at NAG about availability of NAG FORTRAN 90 > for freeBSD. They have a version that works well with freeBSD 2.2 but claim > that it will not function with freeBSD 3.1. Do you have any information > concerning this problem? Thank you - Gavin I thought the NAG compilers generated `C' code (which is what gives them their flexibility in target OSs & machines.) But - I believe you should start with NAG and ask them what the problem is... Then, bring that to this forum so we can all, hopefully, straighten it out. - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message