Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:55:17 +0100
From:      Thomas Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de>
To:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Port INDEX dependency list incompletes
Message-ID:  <20021123205517.GA411@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org>
In-Reply-To: <3DDFE0AC.57BF260E@ene.asda.gr>
References:  <3DDF911D.5FF8F512@ene.asda.gr> <3DDF9EFC.E3B42B5D@ene.asda.gr> <20021123170312.3af58fdd.a@grunix.com> <3DDFA761.D459E000@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFCA8A.40104@owt.com> <3DDFE0AC.57BF260E@ene.asda.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Lefteris Tsintjelis (lefty@ene.asda.gr):

> Kent Stewart wrote:
> > 
> > cd /usr/ports
> > make index
> > portsdb -u
> 
> I get almost always "dependency list incompletes" with portsdb -Uu.
> Would it be a good idea to always use the above instead?

Obviously one cannot get error messages from "make index" when one does
not run it. Please read portsdb(1) for what these options do. On the
other hand, the verbose output from "make index" is - as far as I can
tell - nothing to worry about.

     --Thomas

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021123205517.GA411>