From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 19:56:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AA916A4CF; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 19:56:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4C343D46; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 19:56:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a043.otenet.gr [212.205.215.43]) i87Ju4E9003853; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:56:08 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i87Js9Am006288; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:54:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i87Js61n006287; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:54:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:54:06 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20040907195406.GB5958@gothmog.gr> References: <1094426835.767.50.camel@localhost> <20040907175206.GC17387@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040907175206.GC17387@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Phone: +30-2610-312145 Mobile: +30-6944-116520 cc: "Bruce A. Mah" cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: 5.3 Migration Guide X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 19:56:19 -0000 On 2004-09-07 10:52, Brooks Davis wrote: > I'd personally suggest wording the "don't do a source update" bit more > strongly, though I'm not sure how. Maybe a suggestion to see this as an > opportunity to set up that backup infrastructure you've been meaning to > install for the last decade. :-) Actually, somewhat experienced users can bring a 4.7-REL system to CURRENT using source upgrades if they read UPDATING carefully. I've done it a couple of times (during weekend breaks) on my workstation at work as an experiment, to see if upgrades from 4.X to CURRENT still work. I have to agree though that source upgrades are not recommended, since this way the disks cannot be newfs'd to UFS2 and a lot of cleaning up has to be done after the upgrade to make sure there are no stale files left around.