From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 30 05:28:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4067E106568B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from dd12710.kasserver.com (dd12710.kasserver.com [85.13.134.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72008FC18 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from current.Sisis.de (ppp-93-104-33-158.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.33.158]) by dd12710.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413751860977E; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:28:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8U5SW6c002428; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:28:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:28:32 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20090930052832.GA2382@current.Sisis.de> References: <20090928120734.GA3669@current.Sisis.de> <4AC24CF9.5090207@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4AC24CF9.5090207@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WLAN performance Windows/XP ./. FreeBSD 8-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:28:31 -0000 El día Tuesday, September 29, 2009 a las 11:07:53AM -0700, Doug Barton escribió: > Since you asked the question in the most generic way possible, here > are some generic answers: > > 1. Different hardware > a. Different wlan cards (as you pointed out) > b. Different laptops > c. Different harddrives > 2. Different speedtests (java, flash, etc.) > 3. Different protocols (802.11[abg]) > 4. Different settings on the wlan cards (beacons, etc.) > 5. Some sort of preference settings (user-visible or not) on the AP > that prefers one card over the other > > In other words, you haven't given us nearly enough information to > determine anything useful. > > > hope this helps, Ofc you are right that a lot of details will influence the performance, but I was surprised about how big the diff is, ~9 ./, ~6 Mbps; and as others pointed out the tool (speedtest) was wrong because of flash and the distance; I will run tests with a local file server. Thanks for your very helpfull response in any case. matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ People who hate Microsoft Windows use Linux but people who love UNIX use FreeBSD.