From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 16 22:21:13 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6951065674
	for <perl@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:21:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.210.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CBB8FC14
	for <perl@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:21:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so2555265iyb.13
	for <perl@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=owLYSLGfqjHEgPzH+BnF6KfvTG/Wp3xwawECreHaLvU=;
	b=QL4nn6tWbHftNErbo8SYsTqkDWdzegpzpo7o5kIo4KIHl+AnusbfMqQNGVa37KaK7E
	m7scAokqSNbkiT0es5MEXvuTjLH4GnRHOTSP8jYiwkTrQiVONONn+yWlIIz1VFWNY4c3
	iZWSLya3tUQQ02uYdSSGguZCWyOIqTdDGL7rc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.64.66 with SMTP id xh2mr5317147icb.391.1310853064475; Sat,
	16 Jul 2011 14:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: utisoft@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.67.211 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADLo839-NeBEcYwcGN+abuFxbUk+zFwBQ7dUNymh4_BFNkS-Nw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110716212640.GA13201@lonesome.com>
	<CADLo839-NeBEcYwcGN+abuFxbUk+zFwBQ7dUNymh4_BFNkS-Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:51:04 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Xq3RNAdabvH53dcqaKNJBTAW-R0
Message-ID: <CADLo839j3akUhvVrr2Mb0gvCDNDL7U-pgbFx4WQzX9-4xW6DYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org, dougb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RFC: change to bsd.perl.mk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
	<freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:21:14 -0000

On 16 Jul 2011 22:26, "Mark Linimon" <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:
>
> > If bsd.perl.mk is going to be included unconditionally, what's the
> > point of having it in a separate file?
>
>  - perl team can make changes (e.g. minor version update of perl)
>   without -exp run and portmgr approval.  (I would still prefer to do
>   -exp runs for major version updates, of course).
>
>  - easier to read the code.
>

If it's unconditionally included, how does that exempt it from exp-runs?

Surely it's equally risky to commit to it as bsd.port.mk, or have I missed
something?

Chris