From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 28 23:46:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630AF16A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:46:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B7343D45 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from [24.200.248.78] by VL-MO-MR007.ip.videotron.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IFO002PFKP0NB@VL-MO-MR007.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:46:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:46:12 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin In-reply-to: <200504282330.j3SNUW2j090804@realtime.exit.com> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Message-id: <427175C4.6020202@pldrouin.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) References: <200504282330.j3SNUW2j090804@realtime.exit.com> Subject: Re: Dell Wireless 1450 Dual Band WLAN vs Intel PRO/Wireless 2915 WLAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:46:13 -0000 Frank Mayhar wrote: >Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > > >>Which wireless card should I choose for the best support under FreeBSD? >>I've seen that a driver exists on -CURRENT for the Intel card and I >>would like if this is the case for the Dell card. >> >> > >The Dell 1450 is a Broadcom card; there isn't (and won't be) a native >driver for it. You can use the ndis driver, but a better choice would >be an Atheros-chipset-based card like the Senao NL-5354MP Aries2. I >have one of those and it works well. Note that wireless support is a >lot better under -current, though, than under -stable. > > Ok, so if I have the choice only between the two I've written, I guess I should go with the Intel since there's a FreeBSD driver for it.