From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Nov 25 13:47:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA03285
          for stable-outgoing; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 13:47:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA03264
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 13:46:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA13992; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 13:46:29 -0800 (PST)
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Version Resolution? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Nov 1997 09:49:06 MST."
             <199711251649.JAA27402@mt.sri.com> 
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 13:46:29 -0800
Message-ID: <13988.880494389@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Have either of you noticed that the last 6 rounds or so of this have
hardly been entirely useful or enlightening?  Perhaps it's time to
take the debate private until such time as a resolution is reached.

And no, I don't feel that rkw needs an audience to get a fair hearing
for his proposals here - that's the first and foremost delusion of
anyone involved in a fierce debate and it's clearly wrong.  People
aren't interested in monitoring the process when it's reached this
stage of continuing impasse, they just want to see the end results
(whatever they might be).

					Jordan