From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 20:06:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E640516A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:06:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC3443D58 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:06:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linisys@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1524227rng for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:06:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=mKkL+Sz67cDjUG81/ZYlgOVPlus/e97DsRlOZ2ZdkpL6JyOvFwe68AbQc1OPgURQ8uVSBvm5nePntTFFaOwC2ShD/gFFZMGv/xgGjo+dNCvDcsW7cJqBgpvRGkQp1pBdHh04jqttAaS5QposCPzFs8XRdhLCOEAbBV95GfP7dPo= Received: by 10.38.149.10 with SMTP id w10mr924364rnd; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:06:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.73.7 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:06:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <30831386050322120630eaf58d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:06:21 -0600 From: "Chris Tusa at Linisys, LLC" To: Brian Somers In-Reply-To: <20050322122924.71b7c46a@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3083138605032116273eacd0f7@mail.gmail.com> <20050322122924.71b7c46a@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPP Lan Bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Chris Tusa at Linisys, LLC" List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:06:23 -0000 Brian, Very helpful. Someone on another forum suggsted the possibility of adjusting routing using either a routed daemon or setting static routes, but it seems that your method seems quicker. If I segment off the PPP side, do I need to change the subnet mask on the rest of the network as well? (I should know this!) -- Chris > The issue is that 192.168.1.0/24 machines have to know to route > 192.168.2.0/24 stuff through 192.168.1.230, or else the timeclock > machine needs some sort of presence on 192.168.1.0/24. > > This can be done by allocating a segment of 192.168.1.0/24 to the ppp > client and adding ``enable proxyall'' to the ppp server config. > > server: > enable proxyall > set ifaddr 192.168.1.230 192.168.1.232/30 > > client: > set ifaddr 192.168.1.233 192.168.1.230 > > and then setting the addresses on the crossover cable to 192.168.1.233 > and 192.168.1.234. > > The ``enable proxyall'' bit tells ppp to create proxy arp entries for > all of 192.168.1.232/30 (except for .232 and .235), allowing everything > else on 192.168.1.0/24 to think it's talking directly to these machines. > > -- > Brian Somers > Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! > -- Chris Tusa linisys@gmail.com http://people.linisys.com/ctusa Buy books from my Half.com inventory: http://half.ebay.com/shops/shops.jsp?seller_id=1691584